<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.3354/meps09414
For octocorals, sexual reproductive processes are fundamental to maintaining popu- lations and influencing macroevolutionary processes. While ecological data on octocorals have lagged behind their scleractinian counterparts, the proliferation of reproductive studies in recent years now enables comparisons between these important anthozoan taxa. Here we review the systematic and biogeographic patterns of reproductive biology within Octocorallia from 182 spe- cies across 25 families and 79 genera. As in scleractinians, sexuality in octocorals appears to be highly conserved. However, gonochorism (89%) in octocorals predominates, and hermaphro- ditism is relatively rare, in stark contrast to scleractinians. Mode of reproduction is relatively plas- tic and evenly split between broadcast spawning (49%) and the 2 forms of brooding (internal 40% and external 11%). External surface brooding which appears to be absent in scleractinians may represent an intermediate strategy to broadcast spawning and internal brooding and may be enabled by chemical defenses. Octocorals tend to have large oocytes, but size bears no statistically significant relationship to sexuality, mode of reproduction, or polyp fecundity. Oocyte size is sig- nificantly associated with subclade suggesting evolutionary conservatism, and zooxanthellate species have significantly larger oocytes than azooxanthellate species. Based on biogeographic patterns, reef scleractinians appear to disperse longer distances over ecological timescales com- pared to reef octocorals. However, differences in reproductive characteristics between the 2 taxa do not offer an obvious explanation for these different biogeographic patterns.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 122 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |