Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Marine Ecology Progr...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
UNC Dataverse
Article . 2007
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Mesozooplankton omnivory in the upper San Francisco Estuary

Authors: Rollwagen-Bollens, G.; Bollens, S.M.; Gifford, S.M.;

Mesozooplankton omnivory in the upper San Francisco Estuary

Abstract

While many studies have examined mesozooplankton feeding in coastal environments, less attention has been given to this subject in estuaries. We used bottle incubation experiments to measure the feeding rates of a cladoceran (Daphnia sp.), a calanoid copepod (Acartia spp.), and 2 cyclopoid copepods (Oithona davisae and Limnoithona tetraspina) on the protist plankton (<200 μm) of Suisun Bay, which is located in the upper San Francisco Estuary (SFE). Nanoplankton (2 to 15 μm) prey were highly abundant (2000 to 6000 cells ml-1 and 50 to 600 μg C l-1), whereas microplankton (15 to 200 μm) prey were 1 to 2 orders less abundant (10 to 90 cells ml -1 and 1 to 4 μg C l-1). There were few indications that mesozooplankton fed on nanoplankton, while microplankton were often significantly consumed. Daphnia sp. cleared all microplankton prey categories except diatoms at >2 ml predator (pred.)-1 h-1. O. davisae consumed only ciliates in September 2004, while in November 2004 it cleared both ciliates and diatoms at similar rates (0.8 ml pred.-1 h-1). L. tetraspina cleared only aloricate ciliates and flagellates (0.8 to 1.0 ml pred.-1 h-1). Acartia spp. had the highest clearance rates on diatoms of all the predators examined (mean <1.0 ml pred.-1 h-1) but cleared ciliates at even higher rates (>2.0 ml pred.-1 h-1). With respect to biomass ingestion, in every experiment mesozooplankton were found to ingest ciliate carbon at the highest rates (3 to 29 ng C pred.-1 h-1). Our results indicate that while estuarine mesozooplankton are often omnivorous, important species-specific differences exist, and microzooplankton, especially ciliates, are an important component of the upper SFE food web.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    52
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
52
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center