
handle: 10356/178047
Benedict's view of early Burmese phonology was crucial for the vocalism of his entire ST system and is still widely accepted among Tibeto-Burmanists and Sino-Tibetanists. The efforts to reconstruct oBrm seen in Benedict/Matisoff 1972 make quite limited use of the Atsi (Zaiwa) and Maru (Longwo, Langsu) material available then, which is a pity since those are the languages mentioned in the Conspectus which are most closely related to Burmese. Ideas for the reconstruction of oBrm are also seen in Pulleyblank 1963 and Gong 1980, but these grand-scale discussions of Sino-Tibetan follow the comparative method even less, making use only of Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese. ; Published version
Old Burmese, Arts and Humanities, 400, vowels, phonology
Old Burmese, Arts and Humanities, 400, vowels, phonology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
