
doi: 10.3233/faia251401
Dominance analysis methods compare pairs of states in a planning task to prove that one is at least as close to the goal as other. Existing methods compute fact-dominance relations, which identify facts that are at least as good as others in any situation. However, this is only possible when a fact is at least as good as another in every single possible context. We introduce a new notion of conditional dominance, which can identify that a fact dominates another under certain conditions. We extend previous methods to compute dominance by taking into account a set of “contexts” in order to find maximal dominance relations. We propose several strategies to find relevant contexts automatically and show that even with one single condition, one can achieve significant pruning in certain domains.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
