
doi: 10.3233/faia230952
This paper introduces a framework of conceptual structures allocated to statutory expressions during interpretive heuresis. Drawing from cognitive science research on conceptual structures, the study seeks to enhance existing computational models of legal reasoning across various domains. A comprehensive set of conceptual structures applicable in statutory interpretation is reconstructed. This framework increases awareness of potential interpretive options and contributes to the transparency of legal reasoning.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
