
arXiv: 1405.0022
Abstract In 2012, inspired by developments in group theory and complexity, Jockusch and Schupp introduced generic computability, capturing the idea that an algorithm might work correctly except for a vanishing fraction of cases. However, we observe that their definition of a negligible set is not computably invariant (and thus not well-defined on the 1-degrees), resulting in some failures of intuition and a break with standard expectations in computability theory. To strengthen their approach, we introduce a new notion of intrinsic asymptotic density, with rich relations to both randomness and classical computability theory. We then apply these ideas to propose alternative foundations for further development in (intrinsic) generic computability. Toward these goals, we classify intrinsic density 0 as a new immunity property, specifying its position in the standard hierarchy from immune to cohesive for both general and [Formula: see text] sets, and identify intrinsic density [Formula: see text] as the stochasticity corresponding to permutation randomness. We also prove that Rice’s Theorem extends to all intrinsic variations of generic computability, demonstrating in particular that no such notion considers [Formula: see text] to be “computable”.
Recursively (computably) enumerable sets and degrees, Rice's theorem, Other Turing degree structures, generic computability, Mathematics - Logic, immunity, intrinsic density, Algorithmic randomness and dimension, FOS: Mathematics, Logic (math.LO), asymptotic density
Recursively (computably) enumerable sets and degrees, Rice's theorem, Other Turing degree structures, generic computability, Mathematics - Logic, immunity, intrinsic density, Algorithmic randomness and dimension, FOS: Mathematics, Logic (math.LO), asymptotic density
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
