
doi: 10.31880/10344/10249
handle: 11250/2981870 , 10344/10249
The aim of this paper is to extend and articulate an understanding of reduction and limits to consumption as a pathway for achieving resource use within planetary limits. We inquire about leverage points to limit consumption. Our units of analysis are initiatives based on practices of alternative consumption. The context for the study is Norway, an affluent society, and the examples are from the city of Trondheim. We enquire with the research question “which aspects of these initiatives could be leverage points for the establishment of consumption limits in everyday life?” We frame alternative consumption as consumption that refrains from mainstream and normalized forms of product acquisition, use, and discarding. Consequently, we frame limiting consumption as a political project that could help in avoiding unnecesary production and waste, which requires changes in the interlinking between materials, meanings and competences. We analyze 11 examples from the data available and propose three leverage points. 1) Technical knowledge and skills — social learning. 2) Motivation — environment, money savings, and community. 3) Social acceptance — transgression. These are three aspects that could aid in bringing about change across multiple social practices. We link these three aspects to the meanings and competences and to the appropriation of production. Autonomy in defining consumption limits could result from a reappropriation of production as part of participation in social practices.
consumption limits, alternative consumption, social practices, leverage points
consumption limits, alternative consumption, social practices, leverage points
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
