
doi: 10.31648/fso.3045
Services to St. Daniel of Moscow and to St. Roman of Uglich are attributed to Semen Alferiev and to monk Sergius. Both services are almost identical. But there is a certain particularity in this services: there is an impression that they are written by different hymnographers, and if in one case we can talk about new creation in another case we can see only the compilation of borrrowings, mainly from the service to St. Alexander Nevsky. Analyzing these two layers I noticed that the way of the compilation is very similar to other services written by the author of the service to St. Alexander Nevsky, known to us from his signature as “sir monk Michael”. Textological analysis of the borrowed hymns brought me to an idea that one of this services was started by monk Michael and lately finished by Semen Alferiev and monk Sergius. The paper is devoted to the analysis of borrowings and to the hypothesis which of these two services could be started by monk Michael.
602047 Slawistik, 602047 Slavonic studies
602047 Slawistik, 602047 Slavonic studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
