
The article reviews syntagmatic research and defines syntagma as psycholinguistic, semantic-syntactic, semantic-intonational, functional unit. It is indicated that lexical mixing and syntactic dismemberment are the result of syntagmatic studies. At the same time, this article gives a definition of the role that syntagma plays in communicative grammar. Syntagma is divided into two broad categories: subjective and objective substances. It is characterized as the main category that defines the model of communicants, reveals the essence of communicative meaning, and reveals the types, form, speech situation and the meaning of the oral and written speech correlation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
