descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jan 2007Publisher:Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)Journal:Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations - SemEval '07

Authors: Eneko Agirre; Aitor Soroa;

doi: 10.3115/1621474.1621476

Semeval-2007 task 02

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

The goal of this task is to allow for comparison across sense-induction and discrimination systems, and also to compare these systems to other supervised and knowledge-based systems. In total there were 6 participating systems. We reused the SemEval-2007 English lexical sample subtask of task 17, and set up both clustering-style unsupervised evaluation (using OntoNotes senses as gold-standard) and a supervised evaluation (using the part of the dataset for mapping). We provide a comparison to the results of the systems participating in the lexical sample subtask of task 17.

Related Organizations

University of the Basque Country
Spain

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	40
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%