Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Diskursus Jurnal Pen...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Diskursus Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Analisis Alat Kohesi Gramatikal dan Alat Kohesi Leksikal dalam Teks Cerita Pendek Siswa

Authors: Alma Patriani Rohiyana;

Analisis Alat Kohesi Gramatikal dan Alat Kohesi Leksikal dalam Teks Cerita Pendek Siswa

Abstract

<p><em>This study aims to describe the use of the types of grammatical cohesion tools and lexical cohesion tools in the short story texts of Bogor City Senior High School students, and to determine the most dominant use of cohesion tools. The method used is a qualitative descriptive method. The data source of this research is the short story text of the students of class XI SMA Negeri 4 Bogor. The data collection technique used was literature study. Checking the validity of the data using triangulation. The tools of grammatical cohesion that are the focus are references and conjunctions. The tools of lexical cohesion that are the focus are repetition, synonym, antonym, hyponym, collocation, and equivalence. From the results of the analysis found the use of the grammatical cohesion tool for 78 data. Total reference use was 32 findings (41%) and conjunction 46 findings (59%). Furthermore, the use of lexical cohesion tools totaling 140 data. The use of repetitions of 36 findings (26%), synonym 14 findings (10%), antonym 24 findings (17%), hyponym 10 findings (7%), collocation of 24 findings (17%), and equivalence of 32 findings (23%) . It can be concluded that in 25 short stories students found the use of grammatical and lexical cohesion tools, namely, 78 grammatical cohesion tools and 140 lexical cohesion tool data. The most dominant use of grammatical cohesion tools is the use of conjunctions with the findings of 46 quotations (59%) and the most dominant use of lexical cohesion tools, namely the use of repetitions as much as 36 (26%).</em></p><p> </p><p><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>: Grammatical Cohesion Tool, Lexical cohesion tool, Short story.</em></p>

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
hybrid