
doi: 10.2979/jml.00083
Abstract: This essay revisits Juan José Saer’s 1983 novel El entenado/The Witness as a novel, as a work of the literary imagination, for the purpose of challenging the thrust of scholarship that reads it, not as fiction, but as faulty ethnography and historiography and therefore a palimpsest of racist-colonialist tropes about the “cannibal” in the Americas. Saer’s novel bears “witness” to the emergence of “scientific” discourses of human communities in early modernity through its mimicry of the ethnographic mode, but the novel’s fictional and literary properties subvert—rather than reinforce—those very discourses. This is accomplished by the novel’s unnamed narrator in sixteenth-century Spain who retrospectively narrates the ten years he spent in captivity with a cannibalistic society somewhere in South America and became immersed in their community. His account is a self-reflexive meditation on the failure of language to signify as well as the irretrievability and capriciousness of memory. It also implicates the myopic nature of sixteenth-century European thought about its historical “others.”
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
