
The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education presents new challenges, particularly in evaluating the credibility of AI-generated content. This study explores the attitudes and evaluative skills of 279 in-service primary and secondary teachers in assessing AI-generated information on urban heatwaves, as a climate-related issue. Using a quantitative pre-and-post design, data were collected through a digital questionnaire administered before and after a targeted training intervention. The instrument, informed by the CRAAP test, assessed teachers’ ability to critically appraise AI-generated content. Findings revealed initial concerns about students’ reliance on AI and difficulties in evaluating the validity and reliability of AI-generated data. Post-training results demonstrated marked improvements in participants’ evaluative competencies across all CRAAP dimensions, particularly in assessing the currency and relevance of AI-generated content. These outcomes underscore the effectiveness of targeted training and reinforce the ongoing need to strengthen digital and data literacy among educators.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
