Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Professional Med...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Professional Medical Journal
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

DIFFICULT LARYNGOSCOPY;

THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF RATIO OF HEIGHT TO THYROMENTAL DISTANCE VERSUS OTHER COMMON PREDICTIVE TESTS OF UPPER AIRWAY
Authors: FARNOUSH FARZI; ALI MIRMANSOURI; KAMBIZ FORGHANPARAST; Mehrsima Abdolahzade; Hassan Nahvi;

DIFFICULT LARYNGOSCOPY;

Abstract

Background: Preoperative evaluation of anatomical landmarks and clinical factors helps to identify potentially difficultlaryngoscopies; however, its predictive reliability is unclear. As the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) is a newer upper airwaypredictive test for difficult laryngoscopy, the predictive value and odds ratios of RHTMD versus mouth opening, thyromental distance(TMD),neck movement, and oropharyngeal view (modified Mallampati) were evaluated. Methods: Data of 407 consecutive patients scheduled forelective surgery with general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were collected and all five factors were assessed before surgery.Four senior anesthesiology residents, not aware of the recorded preoperative airway assessment, performed the laryngoscopy and grading (asin Cormack and Lehane’s classification). Results: Difficult laryngoscopy (Grade 3 or 4) occurred in 94 patients (23.1%). In the multivariateanalysis, three criteria were found independent for difficult laryngoscopy (neck movement ≤80 degrees; Mallampati Class 3 or 4, and RHTMD≥ 24). Neck movement (NM) ≤ 80 degrees had a higher sensitivity, specificity and PPV than the other factors. After neck movement,Mallampati class 3 and 4, IIG ≤ 3.5 cm and then RHTMD ≥ 24 were valuable with lowest NPV. The multivariate analysis Odds ratio (95%confidence interval) of the NM, Mallampati class, IIG and RHTMD were 18.16 (9.634 – 34.265), 12.498 (6.744 – 23.16), 11.183 (6.571 – 19.03)and 3.123 (1.933 – 5.047) respectively.TMD ≤ 6.5 cm was not recognized as independent variable for difficult laryngoscopy. Conclusions:RHTMD is a useful and valuable screening test for preoperative prediction of difficult laryngoscopy along with common predictive examinations.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold