
Background: Preoperative evaluation of anatomical landmarks and clinical factors helps to identify potentially difficultlaryngoscopies; however, its predictive reliability is unclear. As the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) is a newer upper airwaypredictive test for difficult laryngoscopy, the predictive value and odds ratios of RHTMD versus mouth opening, thyromental distance(TMD),neck movement, and oropharyngeal view (modified Mallampati) were evaluated. Methods: Data of 407 consecutive patients scheduled forelective surgery with general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were collected and all five factors were assessed before surgery.Four senior anesthesiology residents, not aware of the recorded preoperative airway assessment, performed the laryngoscopy and grading (asin Cormack and Lehane’s classification). Results: Difficult laryngoscopy (Grade 3 or 4) occurred in 94 patients (23.1%). In the multivariateanalysis, three criteria were found independent for difficult laryngoscopy (neck movement ≤80 degrees; Mallampati Class 3 or 4, and RHTMD≥ 24). Neck movement (NM) ≤ 80 degrees had a higher sensitivity, specificity and PPV than the other factors. After neck movement,Mallampati class 3 and 4, IIG ≤ 3.5 cm and then RHTMD ≥ 24 were valuable with lowest NPV. The multivariate analysis Odds ratio (95%confidence interval) of the NM, Mallampati class, IIG and RHTMD were 18.16 (9.634 – 34.265), 12.498 (6.744 – 23.16), 11.183 (6.571 – 19.03)and 3.123 (1.933 – 5.047) respectively.TMD ≤ 6.5 cm was not recognized as independent variable for difficult laryngoscopy. Conclusions:RHTMD is a useful and valuable screening test for preoperative prediction of difficult laryngoscopy along with common predictive examinations.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
