
arXiv: 1807.11399
In mathematical applications, category theory remains a contentious issue, with enthusiastic fans and a skepticalmajority. In a muted form this split applies to the authors ofthis note. When we learned that the only mathematically soundfoundation of topological quantum computing in the literature isbased on category theory, the skeptical author suggested to "decategorize" the foundation. But we discovered, to our surprise, thatcategory theory (or something like it) is necessary for the purpose,for computational reasons. The goal of this note is to give a high-level explanation of that necessity, which avoids details and whichsuggests that the case of topological quantum computing is farfrom unique.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Quantum Physics, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Quantum Physics, FOS: Physical sciences, Quantum Physics (quant-ph), Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
