
doi: 10.26749/rstpp.147.1
In the nineteenth century Tasmania experienced a number of epidemic diseases like scarlet fever, diphtheria and, most deadly of all, typhoid. Sanitary reformers attributed the epidemics to contaminated water supplies, accumulations of decomposed rubbish, poorly built houses and the absence of underground drainage schemes. Leading reformers, most notably Dr Edward Swarbreck Hall, were Fellows of The Royal Society of Tasmania and used the society as a forum to identify the causes of epidemic disease and to explain the public health reforms that would prevent death and illness. Lectures and papers by medical doctors, sanitary engineers, and statisticians drew on the latest thinking in sanitary science and helped build momentum for public support of such reforms. This paper examines the arguments of sanitary reformers and the reaction to their interventions and concludes that between 1853 and 1911 the Royal Society was the main forum for debate on public health reform in Tasmania.
public health, Australia, 430100 Historical Studies, 610, RST, papers & proceedings, statistics, natural history, 430000 History and Archaeology, Royal Society of Tasmania, 210000 Science - General, epidemic diseases, sanitary science, Van Diemens Land, science, 430101 History - Australian, doctors
public health, Australia, 430100 Historical Studies, 610, RST, papers & proceedings, statistics, natural history, 430000 History and Archaeology, Royal Society of Tasmania, 210000 Science - General, epidemic diseases, sanitary science, Van Diemens Land, science, 430101 History - Australian, doctors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
