Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ aCQUIRe CQUniversityarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Clicking: A constructivist grounded theory for developing quantitative literacy for learning mathematics in an enabling course in tertiary education

Authors: Mann, Gemma Elizabeth;

Clicking: A constructivist grounded theory for developing quantitative literacy for learning mathematics in an enabling course in tertiary education

Abstract

Clicking is a theory that explains how students in this study developed quantitative literacy for learning mathematics in an enabling course at university. Using a grounded theory methodology, thirteen students from an enabling course at one institution were interviewed about what helped or hindered them in learning mathematics in a tertiary environment. Students who come to enabling courses often have had barriers and disruptions in prior learning experiences. While most come to enabling courses with the aim of improving their skills, progressing on to bachelor degrees and then professions, they often struggle in the formal learning environment. This is particularly so with mathematics with many students reporting that they do not like, or are not good at the subject. Despite the best intentions for this ‘second chance’ learning, numerous students continue to struggle, withdraw, or fail. This attrition is detrimental to students’ confidence, and also undesirable for the university. Even for those who remain, or are able to pass some assessment, they are still not confident in their ability to learn mathematics. Through this study, the concept of ‘clicking’ was found to be central to students’ understanding of the content, in particular, developing literacy practices that resonated with a literacy resource model for learning. Seven interrelated categories reported by the students were theorised through this model, with the key category of clicking emerging as a process for explaining how quantitative literacy was constructed by learners themselves. Clicking for quantitative literacy was constructed through a student learning cycle of relating, holding interest, exploring ways, taking time, practising, and working through confusion; with tailoring of ways of learning mathematics provided by teachers and others such as peers, family, friends. When used alongside adult learning principles, these findings offer a practical guide for teachers in enabling courses to use with their students to develop their knowledge of how to learn mathematics. For students, being quantitatively literate in ‘learning how to learn mathematics’ through clicking, has implications for success in mathematics learning in their chosen professional studies at university.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

Enabling Education, Adult Education, Mathematics and numeracy curriculum and pedagogy, 370, Mathematics Education, 130208 Mathematics and Numeracy Curriculum and Pedagogy, Higher education, 130103 Higher Education, Enabling education, Mathematics education, Adult education

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities