
doi: 10.25365/phaidra.60
handle: 11353/10.912348
The darknet is not just a place for criminalised activities; it facilitates anonymous communication between all those adopting marginalised positions, including human rights activists, dissidents and whistleblowers. They show that our society must face the dilemma between freedom and control. My article seeks to do two things. First, I would like to explain what lies behind the term darknet. By sharpening our understanding of the term, I would like to help demystify the darknet. Second, I would like to discuss a fundamental dilemma associated with the darknet as a place both for criminalised activities and freedom of expression. Finding a way to deal with this seemingly irresolvable contradiction between power and freedom should, in my opinion, be part of a broader societal process of negotiation. It is to this process that I wish to contribute with this article.
darknet, anonymity, power relations, criminalised activities, freedom of expression, security, surveillace
darknet, anonymity, power relations, criminalised activities, freedom of expression, security, surveillace
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
