
doi: 10.2514/6.2006-7038
The paper provides a review of how to estimate a probability of failure from a small sample of data, and shows that the usual estimators of the parameters of the cumulative distribution function are biased, and can lead to unconservative estimations. Then, it explores different ways to make this estimation conservative: one is based on adding constraints when distributions are fitted; the second is based on the use of bootstrap methods. We explore the relationship between the chance that the estimate is conservative and the accuracy of the estimate. In particular, we study the case when we want to achieve a 95% chance to have conservative estimators. Finally, these methods are applied to the problem of a composite panel under thermal loading.
[MATH.MATH-OC] Mathematics [math]/Optimization and Control [math.OC], [SPI.MECA] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]
[MATH.MATH-OC] Mathematics [math]/Optimization and Control [math.OC], [SPI.MECA] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
