Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Analysis of an axisymmetric two-stream nozzle plume

Authors: C. Smith; Nathan Snyder; Baily Vittal; C. Smith; Nathan Snyder; Baily Vittal;

Analysis of an axisymmetric two-stream nozzle plume

Abstract

The issue of noise generated from aircraft jet engine exhaust has become an important consideration for current and future engines. The ability to predict the acoustic characteristics of an exhaust depends on the accurate prediction of the nozzle plume and associated turbulence quantities using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods. There are a variety of exhaust system concepts being considered for noise reduction. Some of these concepts are complex and thus the question of the ability of CFD codes to accurately predict the plume characteristics arises. To address this question, a relatively simple axisymmetric, two stream nozzle plume that will provide a basis for evaluating the current state of the art in the prediction of nozzle plumes has been studied. The two streams simulate fan and core flows in a typical turbofan engine. Two CFD codes were applied to this problem to corroborate the computational results ahead of the tests. NPARC solves the full Navier-Stokes equations while the other code, PAB3D, solves the thin-layer Navier-Stokes equations. The comparison of the centerline velocities obtained from the two codes indicates a similar decay rate, although the NPARC results indicate a lag in the start of the centerline decay as compared to PAB3D. This difference may be due to the way the compressibility corrections were applied in the turbulence models. Overall, the jet plume characteristics predicted by the two codes show similar results.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!