
doi: 10.2514/3.49064
An efficient implicit Navier-Stokes method for computing steady, three- dimensional flowfields characteristic of high-speed propulsion systems is presented. A nonlinear iteration strategy based on planar Gauss-Seidel sweeps is used to drive the solution toward a steady state, with approximate factorization errors within a crossflow plane reduced by the application of a quasi-Newton technique. A hybrid discretization approach is employed, with flux-vector splitting used in the streamwise direction, and central differences with artificial dissipation used for the transverse fluxes. Convergence histories and comparisons with experimental data are presented for several three-dimensional shock/boundary-layer interactions. Turbulent closure is provided by a modification of the Baldwin-Barth one-equation model.
hybrid discretization, convergence, Other numerical methods (fluid mechanics), quasi-Newton technique, flux-vector splitting, efficient implicit Navier-Stokes method, planar Gauss-Seidel sweeps, Existence, uniqueness, and regularity theory for compressible fluids and gas dynamics, Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics, artificial dissipation, central differences, nonlinear iteration, propulsion systems, shock/boundary-layer interactions, Shear flows and turbulence
hybrid discretization, convergence, Other numerical methods (fluid mechanics), quasi-Newton technique, flux-vector splitting, efficient implicit Navier-Stokes method, planar Gauss-Seidel sweeps, Existence, uniqueness, and regularity theory for compressible fluids and gas dynamics, Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics, artificial dissipation, central differences, nonlinear iteration, propulsion systems, shock/boundary-layer interactions, Shear flows and turbulence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
