<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Perceived Exertion and Stimulus Intensity Modulation

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Aug 1977Publisher:SAGE PublicationsJournal:Perceptual and Motor Skills, volume 45, pages 211-218 (issn: 0031-5125, eissn: 1558-688X,

Authors: Robert L. Gillespie; Robert J. Robertson; Elvina L. Hiatt; Kenneth D. Rose;

doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.45.1.211

pmid: 911381

Perceived Exertion and Stimulus Intensity Modulation

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Perceptual augmentation and reduction were considered contrasting styles of Stimulus Intensity Modulation. Differences in perceived exertion between augmenters and reducers were determined for three cycle ergometer work loads. Subjects were 20 males having similar physiological characteristics. Stimulus Intensity Modulation was determined by kinesthetic figural aftereffect. Augmenters rated their perceptions of physical exertion to be more intense than reducers at 450, 750 and 1050 kpm/min. Differences in physiological responses between augmenters and reducers were not significant at the three work loads. Style of Stimulus Intensity Modulation appeared differentially to influence perceived exertion at the work levels studied.

Related Organizations

University of Nebraska System
United States
Business Breakthrough University
Japan

Keywords

Male, Self-Assessment, Respiration, Physical Exertion, Blood Pressure, Self Concept, Heart Rate, Humans, Kinesthesis, Blood Chemical Analysis, Size Perception, Personality

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	20
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average