
arXiv: 1604.01857
Given any a := (a1; a2,... ; an) and b := (b1; b2;... ; bn) in Rn. The n-fold convex function dened on [a; b], a; b 2 Rn with a < b is a convex function in each variable separately. In this work we prove an inequality of Hermite-Hadamard type for n-fold convex functions. Namely, we establish the inequality
Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, Primary 26B25, Secondary 26B35, 52A20, 52A41, 26D07
Mathematics - Classical Analysis and ODEs, Classical Analysis and ODEs (math.CA), FOS: Mathematics, Primary 26B25, Secondary 26B35, 52A20, 52A41, 26D07
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
