Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Agricultural and Foo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Agricultural and Food Science
Article . 1971 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Agricultural and Food Science
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Agricultural and Food Science
Article . 1971
Data sources: DOAJ
Journal.fi
Article . 1971 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Journal.fi
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The conventional carcass evaluation and the carcass dissection analysis of pigs

Authors: Unto Uusisalmi;

The conventional carcass evaluation and the carcass dissection analysis of pigs

Abstract

The information provided by conventional carcass evaluation concerning the carcass quality established by analyses of dissection was investigated on progeny testing pigs (n = 153). After conventional carcass evaluation, the left half of the carcass was cut up. In the most valuable part of the half carcass (ham + carré + back + fore back + shoulder + kidney fat) the skin + fat component was separated from the meat + bone component. The material was processed by stepwise multiple regression analysis. It was possible by means of the results of conventional carcass evaluation to explain 69 % of the variation in the weight of the skin + fat component and 64 % of the variation in its percentage, 61 % of the variation in the weight of the meat + bone component and 56 % of the variation in its percentage, 59 % of the variation in the weight of the most valuable part of the carcass and 17 % of the variation in its percentage. The estimations calculated for the skin + fat component and its percentage had the same characteristics in conventional carcass evaluation as explanatory variables. The estimations calculated for the meat + bone component and its percentages differed from each other. The estimations calculated for the most valuable part of the carcass and its components also explained the shoulder, back and ham, as follows: a) the shoulder, most weakly, b) the skin + fat of the back, best by the skin + fat estimations (56 % of the variation), c) the meat + bone of the ham, best by the meat + bone estimations (58 % of the variation). The length of the carcass and of the side did not occur in the estimations.

Related Organizations
Keywords

S, Agriculture (General), Agriculture, S1-972

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Published in a Diamond OA journal