
doi: 10.23986/afsci.5668
An inter-row hoe suitable for cereals was developed for the study, and field experiments were conducted to compare inter-row hoeing with weed harrowing, rotary hoeing and chemical control. The treatments were performed once during the growing season. Inter-row hoeing was studied at row spacings of 180 mm and 250 mm. The weeding effect of the different methods was measured by weighing the weeds remaining just before harvesting. Inter-row hoeing was the most effective of the mechanical methods. Weed harrowing was as good as hoeing in silty clay soil but less effective in mull soil. Rotary hoeing was the least effective. Herbicide spraying was more effective than the mechanical methods in both soils. Increasing the spacing between rows from the standard 125 mm to 250 mm decreased the yield of barley by 12-13%. Inter-row hoeing affected the yield very slightly. The yield decreasing was lower at a row spacing of 180 mm than at 250 mm. Weed harrowing and rotary hoeing decreased the yield 5-10%. Although inter-row hoeing seems to be a fairly effective method for weed control, it may be difficult to compensate for the yield loss due to the increase in row spacing.;
spring tine harrow, rivivälihara, Agriculture (General), rotary cultivators, 630, S1-972, mechanical methods, haraus, organic farming, weeds, inter-row hoe, luonnonmukainen viljely, riviväli, rikkakasvit, S, mechanical control, Agriculture, rikkakasviäestys, mekaaninen torjunta, harrow, hoeing, tähtipyörä-äes, row spacing, rotary hoe
spring tine harrow, rivivälihara, Agriculture (General), rotary cultivators, 630, S1-972, mechanical methods, haraus, organic farming, weeds, inter-row hoe, luonnonmukainen viljely, riviväli, rikkakasvit, S, mechanical control, Agriculture, rikkakasviäestys, mekaaninen torjunta, harrow, hoeing, tähtipyörä-äes, row spacing, rotary hoe
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
