
Heterogeneous multicore systems can help adherence to design goals by providing a diverse set of hardware components to meet application requirements. Each core may also have tunable hardware that can reconfigured for different applications. However, scheduling becomes difficult in the presence of tunable hardware due to the additional constraint that an application must be scheduled to a core that offers the best configuration, based on the application’s requirements, to maximize the benefit of the tunable hardware. The scheduling decision can be made by exploring and evaluating each hardware configuration in the design space exhaustively or through the use of a heuristic to evaluate a subset of the design space. However, exhaustive and heuristic approaches do not scale well with the number of available hardware configurations. To improve upon exhaustive and heuristic approaches, in this paper, we present a dynamic scheduling methodology that uses machine learning to schedule applications to the application’s respective best core for reduced energy consumption for a system with configurable caches. We use an artificial neural network (ANN) to train our predictive model, using hardware counters, to predict the best core and a tuning heuristic to determine best configuration on non-best cores. If the best core is busy, our scheduler considers alternative idle cores, or the application is stalled depending on which decision is energy advantageous. Our experiments show that our proposed system can achieve a total energy savings of approximately 33% and 2.5% compared to a fixed-cache, base system when using a configurable instruction and data cache, respectively, while remaining competitive and exhibiting better scaling properties compared to systems adopting a heuristic approach.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
