
doi: 10.2307/833170
IN HIS WINTER 1993 Perspectives article "Why Complexity?" James Boros presents a bipolar view of recent trends in new music with 'the school of complexity" pitted against the "new romantic" school, presenting the former as a musical savior and the latter as a "dungheap." It is absolutely unnecessary to begin an advocacy of one trend by first attacking a claimed, yet unqualified, antithesis. One tires of these Artusi/ Monteverdi, Hanslick/Wagner, Adorno/Stravinsky discourses where one school points its sword in the air, announcing the common enemy to all that is holy and sacred. Boros attempts to discredit the "new romantic" school by claiming that it fails "to explore the limitless inner spaces of the imagination, with the understanding that artistic creation is both life-affirming and lifethreatening." Here Boros not only borrows from antiquated Freudian
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
