
doi: 10.2307/762494
With the entry into force of the American Convention on Human Rights,' the inter-American system for the promotion and protection of human rights became a two-prong system. The first prong is formed by the mechanisms developed under the Charter of the Organization of American States (OAS), which authorizes the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to supervise human rights in the territories of OAS member states. The second prong is composed of the mechanisms set forth in the Convention, which authorizes the Commission and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to handle complaints of human rights violations allegedly committed by any state party to the Convention, and further provides for the Court to exercise advisory jurisdiction. The purpose of this article is to analyze the manner in which these second, Convention-based mechanisms have started to operate. In Part I, I briefly examine the way the Commission operated before the Convention entered into force and then describe the changes that the Convention brought. This section concludes with a discussion of limitations that may impede the
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
