Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Acquisition of Reading in a Second Language

Authors: Ludo T. Verhoeven;

Acquisition of Reading in a Second Language

Abstract

THE PURPOSE of this longitudinal study was to investigate differences in reading acquisition processes between children learning to read in their native language and children learning to read in a second language. The author studied Dutch children and Turkish children as they learned to read in Dutch during the first two grades of primary school in the Netherlands. The children were given a number of tasks to test the efficiency of both word recognition (for words of varying familiarity and complexity) and comprehension processes (including text coherence, anaphoric reference, and inferences). The Turkish children were found to be less efficient in various reading processes in Dutch than their monolingual Dutch peers. However, there was evidence from both word recognition and reading comprehension tasks that Turkish and Dutch children rely on highly comparable strategies. The results from both series of tasks as well as data on the Turkish children's oral proficiency in Dutch and their sociocultural orientation were combined into a structural model to examine the interactions between the various reading processes in Dutch. During the first two grades, both word recognition and reading comprehension appear to be most strongly influenced by children's oral proficiency in the second language. This finding suggests that children learning to read in a second language should be helped to build up their oral skills, and that reading instruction should be matched to those skills.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    113
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
113
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!