
doi: 10.2307/494637
Too OFTEN STUDENT WRITING fits Samuel Johnson's scathing definition of the essay: "A loose sally of the mind; an irregular indigested piece; not a regular and orderly composition." Teachers may be able to show students a better way by showing them how to write historical arguments, for it is hard to write an effective argument without expressing higher order thinking skills in an orderly composition. Yet though teachers sometimes ask for written argument, the results are often disappointing; simply telling students to argue seldom enables them to do so. How, exactly, are students to compose these arguments? How, exactly, are they to put them in writing? What is needed is an approach to historical argumentation that can be explicitly taught, performed and evaluated.' This paper suggests a method of essay instruction serving this approach. Here are six things an essay that argues should do. It should:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
