Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Context Effects on Melody Recognition: Scale-Step versus Interval Representations

Authors: W. Jay Dowling;

Context Effects on Melody Recognition: Scale-Step versus Interval Representations

Abstract

A basic question in cognitive psychology concerns ways in which sensory information is represented in memory. Listeners performed a long-term transposition recognition task in which brief melodies were presented with a chordal context that defined their scale-step interpretations. Context either remained constant or changed at test. In two experiments listeners with moderate amounts of musical experience performed well with constant context but at chance with shifting context. Inexperienced listeners (as well as professionals in one of the studies) performed equally well regardless of context. This result suggests that inexperienced listeners represented melodies as sequences of pitch intervals that remained invariant across context shifts. In contrast, moderately experienced listeners appear to have represented melodies as scale-step sequences that were affected by context. Professionals, while capable of scale-step representation, were able to use a flexible memory-retrieval system to avoid errors with changed context. A third experiment showed that moderately experienced listeners were able to base long-term recognition on either contour or scale-step information, depending on instructions. These results suggest that the scale-step representation used by moderately experienced listeners involved both contour and scale information.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    50
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
50
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!