
doi: 10.2307/40001151
Serdabs, the inaccessible chambers adjoining elite tomb chapels of the Old Kingdom period, were built to hold statues of the tomb owner, members of his family, and other dependents.1 In the late Fourth Dynasty, and more commonly after the middle of the Fifth Dynasty, serdabs also began to include small statues depicting people performing everyday tasks, most often some aspect of food preparation, such as grinding grain and straining beer. James H. Breasted, Jr., in the title of his Egyptian Servant Statues, 2 gave the conventional designation for these statues, which assumes both their identity and their function. They are generally thought to have represented anonymous servants and to have insured that the dead person in whose tomb they were found would have servants in the afterlife to prepare food and do other work for him. Because of the humble tasks they are shown performing, these statues have often been compared with the sacrificed workers found around royal and elite tombs of the First Dynasty, with the wooden figures of workers depicted in early Middle Kingdom models of estate workshops, and with the shabtis that develop in the later Middle Kingdom. The nature and purpose of these Old Kingdom statues, however, have never been questioned or fully investigated. A careful assessment of the tasks depicted, the archaeological context in which the statues appear, and the texts that are inscribed on a few examples suggests that these statues had a more complex purpose than merely to supply labor. For this reason, these statues will here be referred to as "serving statues," which is a more neutral term than "servant statues" in that it does not presuppose the identity of the people depicted or the purpose of their representation.3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
