Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Radiation Sensitization by Thiol-Binding Agents of Radioresistant and Radiosensitive Escherichia coli and the Oxygen Effect

Authors: H, Moroson; D N, Tenney;

Radiation Sensitization by Thiol-Binding Agents of Radioresistant and Radiosensitive Escherichia coli and the Oxygen Effect

Abstract

Dose-survival curves of four strains of E. coli-B/r her- try-, Bs-1, B/r CSH, and 15T-were obtained in the presence and in the absence of non-toxic levels of several thiol-binding agents-N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), iodoacetamide (IA), and hydroxymercuribenzoate (HMB). The degree of radiosensitization by these agents was estimated from the increase in slope of the dose-survival curve, under anoxic and aerobic conditions. Chemical sensitization of both radioresistant and radiosensitive strains of bacteria with the thiol-binding enzyme poisons NEM, IA, and HMB has been observed. NEM sensitized only under anoxic conditions, IA sensitized under both anoxic and aerobic conditions, although to a much greater extent aerobically, and HMB sensitized only under aerobic conditions. The formation of long-lived radiolytic products toxic to bacteria is observed in sensitization by IA. When sensitization occurs, the magnitude of the dose-modifying factor is equal to or greater than the oxygen enhancement ratio. Inhibition of an energy-requiring enzymic repair process does not seem to be involved as a primary mechanism of sensitization. Interference by thiol-binding agents with a "rapid repair" process which is different from the usual "enzymic repair," and which operates in radio-sensitive as well as in radioresistant bacteria, is suggested.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Oxygen, Radiation-Sensitizing Agents, Oxygen Consumption, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Escherichia coli, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Sulfhydryl Compounds, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Tolerance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!