<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.2307/3570476
pmid: 13527606
Protection of a substance against certain modes of radiolysis by introduction of a low-concentration solute which can interfere with the normal fate of some primary intermediate can be achieved by a variety of mechanisms (1). The system most extensively studied in this connection is cyclohexane + benzene. Reduction of the yield of hydrogen and ethylene by addition of small amounts of benzene to cyclohexane is not adequately explained solely on the basis of a scavenging process in which benzene intercepts H atoms (2, 3). An alternative suggested mechanism of such observed protection is energy transfer (via either charge or virtual photon) from cyclohexane to the more stable benzene. This paper describes and interprets results of additional studies of the effects of iodine and other additives on the yield of hydrogen from the cyclohexane + benzene system. Similar experiments by Schuler (4) have recently been reported.
Radiation Effects, Radiation Protection, Cyclohexanes, Benzene, Iodine
Radiation Effects, Radiation Protection, Cyclohexanes, Benzene, Iodine
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |