Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Household Labor in Intergenerational Households

Authors: Glenna Spitze; Russell Ward;

Household Labor in Intergenerational Households

Abstract

The study of household labor has grown dramatically in recent years. Researchers have investigated how husbands and wives divide household labor, how this division is influenced by paid work, and whether husbands and wives feel the distribution is fair. However, little attention has been given to other household members. One group that has received perhaps the least attention, considering their growing numbers, is adult children who reside in parental households. Our goal is to investigate their contributions to household labor, and to determine whether patterns look different when reported by parents or adult children. Investigations of parent-adult child coresidence have noted that its determinants reflect the child's needs more than the parent's, contrary to perceived burdens of adult children in our aging society (Ward, Logan, & Spitze, 1992; see also Aquilino, 1990; Crimmins & Ingegneri, 1990; Speare & Avery, 1993). As a sideline to our earlier analysis (Ward et al., 1992), which used a local probability sample, we found that coresident adult children did a small fraction of total housework (although daughters did more than sons) and that parents with no coresident adult children did less housework than those with adult children in the household. Given our sample size and the manner in which housework was measured, we feel that more attention to adult children's housework is in order. This issue is important for two reasons. First, housework is an experience that may prepare young adults for sharing households with peers (including spouses). Although much learning of household skills occurs before age 18, young adults who stay in the parental household may face more explicit demands for participation in the work they help generate. Those who come to view this as an expected part of adult life should find the transition from the parental household to other shared living smoother than those who become accustomed to parents "waiting on" them. Second, housework is part of the larger picture of intergenerational exchanges. Adult children of any age who live in parental households may "trade" housework for coresidence, implicitly or explicitly, or housework may be part of what parents provide without any clear return. Since coresidence is becoming more common, some have questioned its effects on parental well-being and parent-child relations (see Ward & Spitze, 1992). Whether adult children share in housework is likely to affect the well-being of parents who may otherwise have an increased burden. On the other hand, adult children may experience heavy housework burdens as part of caregiving for elderly parents. Thus, housework may be part of the overall exchange in these households and patterns of housework may have implications for how equity is defined. CHILDREN'S PARTICIPATION IN HOUSEHOLD LABOR Parents give four kinds of reasons for assigning chores to children: developmental (building character, responsibility), reciprocal obligation (part of being in a family), extrinsic (parents need the help), and task learning (White & Brinkerhoff, 1981a). Development of character and responsibility are by far the most common reasons cited. The developmental rationale becomes somewhat less salient with child's age (presumably teens have developed some responsibility, or parents have given up), while other rationales increase with age. Extrinsic reasons are much more common in single-parent families (White & Brinkerhoff, 1981a). Since most parents subscribe to traditional gender role attitudes, the housework of boys and girls mirrors that of adults, with girls doing stereotypically female chores and spending more time at housework (Benin & Edwards, 1990; Blair, 1992; Goldscheider & Waite, 1991; Hilton & Haldemann, 1991; Timmer, Eccles, & O'Brien, 1985; White & Brinkerhoff, 1981b). Gender differences increase with age; teenage girls spend about twice as much time in housework as boys (Timmer et al. …

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!