Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Biological Selectivity of Extinction: A Link between Background and Mass Extinction

Authors: Jennifer A. Kitchell; David L. Clark; Andrew M. Gombos;

Biological Selectivity of Extinction: A Link between Background and Mass Extinction

Abstract

The phenomenon of non-random or selective survival across major extinction boundaries in the geologic past is poorly understood but increasingly recognized as a critical area for future research. A current hypothesis, developedfrom a comparison of extinction patterns among Late Cretaceous molluscs, is that biological adaptations of organisms effectual during normal times of earth history are ineffectual during times of mass extinction. Microsampling of laminated biosiliceous marine sediments from the highlatitutde Alpha Ridge (-86? N lat.) provides evidence of an actively exploited biological adaptation by Late Cretaceous planktonic diatoms. Distinctive laminae reveal a life-history strategy comprised of alternating planktonic and nonplanktonic stages. Contrary to the hypothesis that mass extinctions are indifferent to biological adaptations, these data indicate a link between selection for traits in normal paleoenvironmental settings and differential survival during an unexpected episode of paleoenvironmental deterioration during a mass extinction. Planktonic diatoms, adapted locally to surviving periods of stress by leaving the plankton environment, may have differentially survived a global crisis at the end of the Cretaceous as a consequence of a life-history trait. The interaction of this proximate biological adaptation and the postulated end-Cretaceous extinction mechanisms may have played a major role in the unexpectedly high survival of planktonic diatoms, documenting a clear example of causal dependency between a biologic character selected for during times of normal or background extinction and macroevolutionary survivorship during times of crisis.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    80
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
80
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!