Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Morphology of the Deep-Sea Copepod Bobkabata kabatabobbus (Lernaeosoleidae: Poecilostomatoida) and Amended Diagnosis of Lernaeosoleidae

Authors: G W, Benz; J S, Braswell;

Morphology of the Deep-Sea Copepod Bobkabata kabatabobbus (Lernaeosoleidae: Poecilostomatoida) and Amended Diagnosis of Lernaeosoleidae

Abstract

New morphological information on the deep-sea parasitic copepod Bobkabata kabatabobbus Hogans and Benz, 1990 (Lernaeosoleidae: Poecilostomatoida) is provided based on 2 newly discovered, complete specimens collected from a pallid sculpin, Cottunculus thomsoni (Gunther, 1882), captured in water 1,463 m deep in Welker Canyon off Rhode Island (western North Atlantic). The first antennae of both specimens were tiny, indistinctly segmented, and armed with spiniform setae. Terminal segments of the second antennae were robust hooks and were impossible to disengage from the host without severing them from their basal sockets. A simple orifice without any associated appendages may have represented the mouth. Both specimens were transformed adult females and each was embedded in the flesh of their scaleless host up to where the pregenital trunk began to broaden into its characteristic horseshoe shape. Whereas each copepod's bulbous cephalothorax appeared to be the primary attachment device, the powerfully hooked second antennae seemed positioned to facilitate the application of the presumed mouth to the host. A revised family diagnosis for Lernaeosoleidae Hogans and Benz, 1990 is provided that primarily differentiates Lernaeosoleidae from the closely allied Chondracanthidae H. Milne-Edwards, 1840 and other poecilostomatoids based on the absence of mandibles, first and second maxillae, maxillipeds, and thoracic legs 1-4 in lernaeosoleids.

Keywords

Fishes, Ectoparasitic Infestations, Fish Diseases, Crustacea, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Female, Seawater

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!