Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Multivariate Morphometrics of Larvae of the Blacklegged Tick (Ixodes Scapularis) with Notes on Nomenclature

Authors: H J, Hutcheson; J H, Oliver;

Multivariate Morphometrics of Larvae of the Blacklegged Tick (Ixodes Scapularis) with Notes on Nomenclature

Abstract

A morphological study of the larval stage of the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis, was conducted to further examine congruence between northern and southern morphotypes. Preliminary ANOVA revealed that 9 characters were not significantly different; thus 28 characters were used in analyses of a total of 8 groups of I. scapularis originally from Minnesota, Massachusetts, Maryland, Missouri, North Carolina, Georgia, F1 progeny of reciprocal crosses of ticks from Massachusetts and Georgia, and I. pacificus from California. Principal components (PC) analysis identified seven setal (sternal, preanal, 3 scutal, central, and marginal dorsal) and 3 nonsetal characters (interauricular distance, hypostome internal file, and coxa I internal spur) with positive static allometries. All Mahalanobis distances in canonical variate analyses (CVA) including and excluding I. pacificus and setal characters were significantly different. Scatterplots from PC and CVAs separated I. pacificus from all other groups in the first axis; the second function arranged groups in a pattern related to latitude. Unlike the results of previously reported nymphal analyses, no multivariate effect related to longitude was revealed; however, Missouri larvae had the shortest values for 2 setal and 9 nonsetal characters. As in nymphs, frequency polygons revealed an overlapping/continuous pattern, indicative of clinal geographic variation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Analysis of Variance, Ixodes, United States, Terminology as Topic, Multivariate Analysis, Animals, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!