Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Epizootiological and Experimental Studies on Bovine Cysticercosis in East Africa

Authors: G M, URQUHART;

Epizootiological and Experimental Studies on Bovine Cysticercosis in East Africa

Abstract

exact incidence in many areas, the condition is widespread and extremely common. Some typical figures are: Bechuanaland 0.6 to 86 percent (Rep. Vet. Serv. 1956); Belgian Congo 22 to 60 percent (Rep. Vet. Serv. 1957); Cameroons 16 percent (Merle, 1958); Ethiopia 80 percent (Graber, 1959); French Guinea 20 percent (Graber, 1959); Kenya 30 percent (Ginsberg et al, 1956); Madagascar 2 to 17 percent (Rapp. Ann., 1956); Nigeria 10 percent (Graber, 1959); Oubangui 30 to 69 percent (Graber, 1959); Sierra Leone 23 to 55 percent (Peel, 1953); Tanganyika 50 percent (Rep. Vet. Serv. 1958); Tchad Republic 0.4 to 15 percent (Graber, 1959); Uganda 5 to 75 percent (Coyle, personal communication 1960); Union of South Africa 2.8 percent (Merle, 1958). The status of other African countries was reviewed by Graber (1959), Merle (1958), and Viljoen (1937). Adequate meat inspection facilities, thorough cooking of meat and the desire of infected persons to seek treatment have resulted in the virtual eradication of bovine cysticercosis in civilized communities. In contrast, meat inspection facilities are lacking over large areas of Africa, meat is often consumed raw or partially cooked and infected persons frequently regard their tapeworms with equanimity. While the situation will be resolved eventually by the expanding medical, veterinary, and

Keywords

Cysticercosis, Animals, Cattle Diseases, Cattle, Africa, Eastern

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    67
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
67
Average
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!