Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Aggression and Dominance in House Finches

Authors: Belthoff, James R.; Gauthreaux, Sidney A., Jr.;

Aggression and Dominance in House Finches

Abstract

BECHARD, M. J., R. L. KNIGHT, D. G. SMITH, AND R. E. FITZNER. 1990. Nest sites of sympatric hawks (Buteo spp.) in Washington. J. Field Ornith. 61: 159-170. CLARK, P. J., AND F. C. EVANS. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445-453. CODY, M. L. 1974. Competition and the structure of bird communities. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. COTTRELL, M. J. 1981. Resource partitioning and reproductive success of three species of hawks (Buteo spp.) in an Oregon prairie. M.S.thesis, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR. ENSIGN, J. T. 1983. Nest site selection, productivity, and food habits of Ferruginous Hawks in southeastern Montana. M.S.thesis, Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT. GILMER, D. S., AND R. E. STEWART. 1983. Ferruginous Hawk populations and habitat use in North Dakota. J. Wildl. Manage. 47:146-157. JANES, S. W. 1984. Influences of territory composition and interspecific competition on Red-tailed Hawk reproductive success. Ecology 65:862-870. PIA uA, E. R. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4:53-74. POOLE, K. G., AND R. G. BROMLEY. 1988. Interrelationships within a raptor guild in the central Canadian Arctic. Can. J. Zool. 66:2275-2282. SCHMUTZ, J. K., S. M. SCHMUTZ, AND D. A. BOAG. 1980. Coexistence of three species of hawks (Buteo spp.) in the prairie-parkland ecotone. Can. J. Zool. 50:1075-1089. SCHOENER, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27-39.

Country
United States
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    42
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
42
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!