
doi: 10.2307/2997055
TRrrON, L. M. (USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, P.O. Box 968, Burlington, VT 05402) AND T. G. SIccAMA (Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT 06512). What proportion of standing trees in forests of the Northeast are dead? Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1 17: 163-166. 1990.-Based on 46 data sets, this paper documents standing dead trees as a proportion of total basal area and density of forest stands in the Northeast. Stands were grouped into six forest cover types ranging from coastal oak and pine types to montane spruce and fir. Over the wide diversity of stand histories, species, and sites studied, the proportion of dead trees was 3-43% of total basal area and 5-36% of total density. Montane spruce-fir stands characteristically had high proportions of standing dead trees, expressed as basal area and density. By quantifying the proportion of dead trees occurring in forests of the Northeast, this study provides a reference for evaluating overall forest vigor or decline.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
