
doi: 10.2307/2963676
The “implicational paradoxes” are treated by most contemporary logicians somewhat as follows:“The two-valued prepositional calculus sanctions as valid many of the obvious and satisfactory inferences which we recognize intuitively as valid, such as(A→.B→C)→.A→B→.A→C,2andA→B→.B→C→.A→C;it consequently suggests itself as a candidate for a formal analysis of implication.
mathematical logic
mathematical logic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 79 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
