
doi: 10.2307/2553628
In a paper that has become a standard reference in the structure-conductperformance approach to industrial economics, Cowling and Waterson (1976) developed a theoretical rationale for expecting industry profitability to be positively correlated with the level of concentration. Their model, based on a simple algebraic description of oligopoly behaviour, has been interpreted as providing a justification for the common empirical practice of cross-industry regression analysis of price-cost margins in terms of concentration levels. In the present paper we show that, on further examination, this model implies a joint determination of margins and concentration. This provides some interesting comparative static results of relevance to inter-industry differences in concentration levels. Equally, however, it leads to various (cautionary) insights concerning the meaning of price-cost margin versus concentration regressions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 128 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
