
doi: 10.2307/2533964
pmid: 9235120
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are frequently used to assess the usefulness of diagnostic markers. When several diagnostic markers are available, they can be combined by a best linear combination: that is, when the area under the ROC curve of this combination is maximized among all possible linear combinations. This maximal area is the generalized ROC criterion, which provides a measure of how effective the combination of the markers is. This criterion needs to be estimated from the data, and is usually evaluated against single markers. In the present paper, we provide confidence intervals for the generalized ROC criterion under the assumption of homogeneous covariance matrices, derive an approximation for the heterogeneous covariance matrices case, and evaluate the approximation via a simulation study. Finally, we present an illustrative example.
Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, Biometry, Models, Statistical, Genetic Carrier Screening, Muscular Dystrophies, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions, ROC Curve, Hemopexin, diagnostic markers, Case-Control Studies, Diagnosis, Humans, receiver operating characteristic curves, Computer Simulation, Creatine Kinase, Biomarkers
Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, Biometry, Models, Statistical, Genetic Carrier Screening, Muscular Dystrophies, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Nonparametric tolerance and confidence regions, ROC Curve, Hemopexin, diagnostic markers, Case-Control Studies, Diagnosis, Humans, receiver operating characteristic curves, Computer Simulation, Creatine Kinase, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 52 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
