Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao zbMATH Openarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
zbMATH Open
Article
Data sources: zbMATH Open
Biometrics
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Bootstrap Comparison of Genetic Covariance Matrices

A bootstrap comparison of genetic covariance matrices
Authors: Goodnight, Charles J.; Schwartz, James M.;

A Bootstrap Comparison of Genetic Covariance Matrices

Abstract

Summary: An important problem in evolutionary biology is how population bottlenecks affect additive genetic variance \((V_A)\). When only additive effects are present, a decrease in \(V_A\) is predicted, whereas with many forms of nonadditive interactions, an increase is predicted. We present an analysis of the changes in variance that occur as a result of a bottleneck in a population of the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. In this experiment, the additive genetic covariance matrix for four traits in two sexes was measured in the ancestral population. The population then went through a bottleneck and the genetic covariance matrix was again measured. These data were analyzed by first examining the univariate estimates for \(V_A\) and, second, examining the covariance matrices. For the univariate measures, the statistic we used was the change in \(V_A\). For the multivariate comparisons, we used three measures: the difference in rank (the difference in the number of positive eigenvalues) to test changes in the number of heritable traits, a multivariate equivalent of Bartlett's statistic to test changes in the size of the matrices, and a modification of Mantel's correlation [see \textit{N. Mantel}, Cancer Res. 27, 209-220 (1967)] to test for changes in the correlation structure of the matrices. Because the distribution of all of these measures is complex and dependent on the specifics of the particular matrices being compared, we chose to use a bootstrap analysis to test for significance. For females, we found that, following the population bottleneck, \(V_A\) was significantly decreased and that the correlation structure of the matrix was significantly changed. For males, we found that, following the population bottleneck, \(V_A\) significantly increased but that the correlation structure was unchanged.

Keywords

Problems related to evolution, comparing covariance matrices, Mantel's test, Nonparametric statistical resampling methods, Genetics and epigenetics, MANOVA, bootstrap analysis, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Bartlett's test, multivariate quantitative genetics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!