
doi: 10.2307/2533504
handle: 2440/5149
Summary: The analysis of a series of crop variety trials often proceeds using a mixed model in which the data are the combined means from individual trials. The residual variation for this model consists of genotype by environment \((\text{G}\cdot\text{E})\) interactions and within-trial error variation. The latter is regarded as known from the analyses of individual trials, and any associated heterogeneity can be accounted for in the overall mixed model by the use of weights. The \(\text{G}\cdot\text{E}\) interactions may also have nonconstant variance and, since the variances themselves are often of interest, we propose that heterogeneity arising from these sources be accommodated by modelling the \(\text{G}\cdot\text{E}\) variances as a log-linear function of explanatory variables. We present a residual maximum likelihood estimation method and develop a diagnostic technique for detecting dependence. The approach is demonstrated using a large unbalanced set of crop variety testing data. The methodology is easily generalized to residual variance modelling in any mixed model application.
variance heterogeneity, genotype stability, Estimation in multivariate analysis, residual maximum likelihood estimation, Genetics and epigenetics, genotype of environment interaction, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
variance heterogeneity, genotype stability, Estimation in multivariate analysis, residual maximum likelihood estimation, Genetics and epigenetics, genotype of environment interaction, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
