
doi: 10.2307/2533380
pmid: 8068837
It is often said that the coherence of an association between a treatment and outcomes is important in judging whether the association is causal. An attempt is made to quantify the evidence provided by a coherent association. This is done in two steps. First, a test is developed to detect a coherent association. The test is a generalization of the tests of Mann and Whitney, Wilcoxon, and Gehan. Second, the sensitivity of the test to hidden bias is examined. The question is whether a coherent pattern of associations implies less sensitivity to hidden biases. An example is considered in detail.
Chromosome Aberrations, Biometry, Fishes, Chromosome Disorders, Methylmercury Compounds, Sensitivity and Specificity, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Diet, Treatment Outcome, Animals, Humans, Nonparametric hypothesis testing, Cells, Cultured, Mathematics
Chromosome Aberrations, Biometry, Fishes, Chromosome Disorders, Methylmercury Compounds, Sensitivity and Specificity, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Diet, Treatment Outcome, Animals, Humans, Nonparametric hypothesis testing, Cells, Cultured, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
