
doi: 10.2307/2529276
The results of a simulation study comparing the method of maximum likelihood for binary regression with unreplicated data and two approximate methods are presented and discussed. The two approximate methods are that of Cox [1966] and unweighted least squares with the 0's replaced by -3 and the l's by +3. The results indicated that with 20 or more data values the maximum likelihood methods worked quite well but that with fewer than 20 the approximate methods are to be preferred.
Linear inference, regression, Point estimation, Monte Carlo methods
Linear inference, regression, Point estimation, Monte Carlo methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
