Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Grazing in Bithynia tentaculata: Age-specific Bioenergetic Patterns in Reproductive Partitioning of Ingested Carbon and Nitrogen

Authors: Jay Shiro Tashiro;

Grazing in Bithynia tentaculata: Age-specific Bioenergetic Patterns in Reproductive Partitioning of Ingested Carbon and Nitrogen

Abstract

Age- and sex-specific grazing rates have been studied in specimens of Bithynia tentaculata from Oneida Lake, New York. Two artificial foods and Aufwuchs grown in Oneida Lake were used as grazing substrates. These foods were of different protein quality and organic content. Concomitant analyses of assimilation, respiration and nitrogen excretion allowed assessments of bioenergetic partitioning through the life cycle. Weight-specific hourly rates for ingestion, egestion, respiration and nitrogen ex- cretion were measured. These measurements provided data for calculation of assimila- tion and nonrespired assimilation. Weight-specific rates of food, carbon and nitrogen allocation were used to construct bioenergetic profiles for breeding females. Such data were coupled with laboratory fecundity and growth data and were used to examine hypotheses of age-specific and trophic-limited reproduction in the iteroparous popula- tion of Bithynia studied. Older females have a higher reproductive effort than younger regardless of trophic constraints. Further, protein may be a limiting factor in egg production. As predicted from hypotheses on age-specific reproduction, younger females always have a propor- tionately lower reproductive effort than older females (measured as net reproductive biomass or as reproductive biomass as a fraction of nonrespired assimilation). Trophic conditions influence patterns of fecundity. Consistent with theory on reproductive fac- tors, younger females on low protein food curb their reproductive effort in favor of somatic growth and maintenance.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!