
doi: 10.2307/2424752
Winter stoneflies (Zapada oregonensis, Z. cinctipes and Capnia confusa) used detritus as a nymphal food almost exclusively and dominated the shredder biomass in a third-order mountain stream in Colorado. Laboratory feeding trials showed that ingestion rates and fecal production were temperature-dependent, although not greatly different between aspen or alder leaf discs. Assimilation efficiency (AE) was not temperature-dependent. Higher AE values for alder indicate that it is superior to aspen as a food source. High consumption rates (ca. 30% of body weight/day) by the shredders, even at low temperatures, would result in the conversion of considerable quantities of leaf litter to finer particles. However, size fraction analysis of egested material indicated that particle size reduction by shredder processing only partially explains detrital composition in a stream dominated by fine-particle feeding detritivores.
Zapada cinctipes, Colorado, Spermatophyta, Angiosperms, Arthropoda, Plecoptera: Insecta, Alder, Dicots, Betulaceae: Dicotyledones, Animalia, Animals, Spermatophytes, Zapada oregonensis, Plantae, Arthropods, Forest Sciences, USA, Invertebrata, Vascular Plants, Salicaceae: Dicotyledones, Aspen, Ingestion Rate Feces Temperature, trophic status, Plants, Invertebrates, Insects, Angiospermae, food conversion, Capnia confusa, aquatic insects, feeding, food preferences
Zapada cinctipes, Colorado, Spermatophyta, Angiosperms, Arthropoda, Plecoptera: Insecta, Alder, Dicots, Betulaceae: Dicotyledones, Animalia, Animals, Spermatophytes, Zapada oregonensis, Plantae, Arthropods, Forest Sciences, USA, Invertebrata, Vascular Plants, Salicaceae: Dicotyledones, Aspen, Ingestion Rate Feces Temperature, trophic status, Plants, Invertebrates, Insects, Angiospermae, food conversion, Capnia confusa, aquatic insects, feeding, food preferences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
